king reviews – ‘salem’s lot

 

 

Not the biggest image, but it is the cover of the paperback I’ve been reading:

salemslot_mybook

 

A vast improvement on Carrie, in my humble opinion. The dates at the end show it took Stephen King more than 30 months between first word and last, and given the huge difference in content and approach and detail, I have to wonder how much of that was spent rewriting. And how different a novel Carrie might have been with the same approach? In On Writing, he claims to have written most of Carrie in two weeks. ย But this is about ‘salem’s Lot. ๐Ÿ˜‰

I didn’t really sleep last night, so I’ve spent a chunk of time reading this over the last 7 hours. It is certainly a step toward the writer he has become, expertly merging different characters in different places happening simultaneously. But even here, he occasionally does something I don’t like, but something I know I still do, and that is to almost recap what is about to happen before backtracking and leading us through it. I feel this is kind of like a newspaper article, in that the first paragraph generally tells you the whole story in condensed form, and the subsequent paragraphs flesh out the various parts. At least, that’s how I remember it being discussed way back when I was at uni.

The place is a character in ‘salem’s Lot, and ends up feeling just as important as most of the others. Places have often featured in this way in his novels, with a quality example being IT. It also features a prologue and epilogue, which as contemporary writers we are warned against. I’m still not sure why. It has been argued that some readers skip prologues, and will therefore miss something the writer deemed important, while considering it fluff before the feast. More shame on the reader there, I say. Here, they serve as tasty bookends.

Something I had forgotten from this novel is… how few actual murders-by-vampires we see, and how little of Straker, and especially Barlow. Another surprise was how late in the book young Mark Petrie came to the fore; he’s mentioned earlier as the destination for the Glick boys, but doesn’t really appear until later. But many of the main deaths appear off-stage, as it were, although I won’t go into details here as I don’t want to spoil anything if you are new to it.

It is a scary book, and a definite page-turner, but filled as much (if not more) with character and camaraderie than vampires and neck-spoiling.

Next up – The Shining. Although I’m not sure if it will be the very next book I read (partly because I re-read it just last year, I think), it has been moved to a prominent position, with Jack Torrance already thinking, Officious little…

๐Ÿ™‚

 

 

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. I agree–‘Salems Lot was a huge step forward from Carrie. I have enjoyed all of Mr. King’s books, (some more than others) from Carrie to his latest, Revival, which I have just started reading. My personal favorite is The Stand. I don’t think Mr. King will ever top it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The Stand is fabulous. I tend to re-read either the original or the unleashed version at least every third year now. Imho, even the unleashed version is too short, as I wanted other scenes included. ๐Ÿ™‚

      I was trying to hold off on REVIVAL until I can get it in paperback, as I don’t enjoy hardbacks – I read Under The Dome in hardback and didn’t enjoy it, then later re-read in paperback and loved it. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ ๐Ÿ˜‰ And I read Mr Mercedes on kindle and didn’t enjoy it as much as I think I might have in paperback. Weird but true, I know.

      Though I am tempted by Revival on Kindle, as it’s only ยฃ2.99

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s